« [SSJ: 11104] The 16th Hakuhodo Foundation Japanese Research Fellowship - Now Accepting Applications | Main | [SSJ: 11106] Re: July 3: (Online) ISS / Shaken PhD Workshop: Yosuke Buchmeier (Munich) »
June 11, 2020
[SSJ: 11105] Special Issue in Pacific Affairs: Renegotiating Social Risks in the People's Republic of China and Japan
From: Hanno Jentzsch <hanno.jentzsch@univie.ac.at>
Date: 2020/06/09
+++With apologies for crossposting+++
Dear all,
we are pleased to announce our special issue in Pacific Affairs, entitled "Renegotiating Social Risks in the People's Republic of China and Japan". We hope that this publication will be of interest for some of you!
Guest editors: Hanno Jentzsch and Alison Lamont
https://pacificaffairs.ubc.ca/issues/current-issue/
Abstract:
There have been various attempts to capture the direction of welfare provision in Japan and the People's Republic of China (PRC) as a regionally coherent welfare regime, following on from attempts by the welfare regime literature to categorize nation-states by the characteristics of their welfare provision in the West. However, stark differences between the PRC and Japan as regional neighbours, and even within the regions of each country, pose a challenge to this kind of macro-level theorizing. This special issue seeks to supplement macro perspectives on welfare regimes by exploring a range of welfare policies across both states from an ethnographic, bottom-up perspective, which captures the dynamic nature of welfare and highlights the importance of understanding how local actors request, interpret, and implement risk management strategies. The management of social risks is shown not to have one clear direction determined by, for example, market logic: instead, this special issue highlights the ways in which the burden of risk shifts between family, market, state, and communities unevenly over time, reflecting underlying institutional norms which are always up for negotiation. In doing so, this special issue emphasizes the importance of local, contextualized understandings of welfare, and suggests that the comparative welfare regimes literature should seek the micro-institutional foundations of welfare provision as the basis for comparison.
With kind regards,
Hanno Jentzsch
Approved by ssjmod at 11:42 AM