« [SSJ: 8508] Re: Female Labor Force Participation Rate | Main | [SSJ: 8510] Re: Female Labor Force Participation Rate »

April 11, 2014

[SSJ: 8509] Re: Female Labor Force Participation Rate

From: Jun Okumura
Date: 2014/04/11

Earl Kinmonth quoted.

"I did not think even Kathy Matsui could be dumb enough to think that this was a good indicator."

Cut her some slack, Earl. She's building a case for gender equality. HIV and and urban crime and gang activities goose the index in a negative way, but otherwise, this isn't a bad measure for that purpose for industrialized economies.

"The 15-64 cohort is widely used. It is unrealistic for contemporary advanced economies. 25-54 or 25-64 is much more realistic."

Agreed.

...

Seriously, JT should be fined.

Jun

Approved by ssjmod at 11:54 AM